One of the most high profile accident cases in recent years caused by rash driving involved the reliance vp legal jahnavi gadkar who consumed a lot of alcohol to celebrate a deal, drove in the wrong lane and killed innocent people in 2015.
In a clear indication of the double standards, dishonesty, corruption of indian intelligence and security agencies, just because some fraud officials are making fake allegations without any proof at all against a harmless domain investor google competitor with a better 1989 jee rank than google ceo sundar pichai, the harmless domain investor has been mercilessly stalked, defamed without any proof, cheated, exploited, tortured since 2010, her resume, retirement savings, correspondence and memory stolen without a court order or legally valid reason.
Though the domain investor, google competitor has not harmed or cheated anyone at all, for more than 7 years since 2010, crores of indian tax payer money have been wasted to hold her a virtual prisoner, with almost all her correspondence stolen, even the intimation slips left by the courier companies, are stolen by the indian intelligence and security agencies without a legally valid reason in panaji, goa
On the other hand when well connected brahmin lawyer jahnavi gadkar kills innocent people due to negligence, rash driving, like the brahmin fraud R&AW employees nayanshree hathwar, siddhi mandrekar who are proven cheaters, she faces almost no punishment and is able to lead a normal life
Can the indian intelligence and security agencies, CBI, R&AW explain in an open debate why there is no equality in India in 2017, when a well connected brahmin woman like Jahnavi Gadkar kills innocent people due to her rash driving, she is allowed to lead a normal life within two years, while a harmless obc bhandari google competitor, domain investor who has not harmed or cheated anyone, is held a virtual prisoner since 2010, her retirement savings stolen by CBI, intelligence and security agencies without a court order or legally valid reason, denying her the fundamental right to privacy and to earn a fair living?